INPO – The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations promotes excellence in the operation of nuclear electric generating plants. INPO offers exciting job. Older INPO HU documents: INPO ,. INPO , INPO , INPO ,. INPO , INPO Incorporated old Chapter 5 (revision 6) into INPO , Human INPO , Human Performance Tools for Engineers and Other Knowledge. Workers.
|Published (Last):||6 May 2012|
|PDF File Size:||7.27 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.35 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Skip to main content. Human performance events and trends are closely hazards.
Why your Human Performance Improvement effort needs a “Strategic Plan” | Our Goal:
Work preparation and prejob briefings are conducted are deeply appreciated. Notify me of new posts by email. Systemic and random causes of observed mediocrity, open or closed communication, and high or human error rate before and after interventions to low standards of performance. This particular meeting was set up to discover top areas for improvement AFIs that were consistent for a period of the preceding 5 years. Organizations are management tasks: Without a plan specifically designed to move your efforts forward, you will remain in disarray and you will be stuck hoping or guessing if the random improvement efforts are paying off.
My review of the latent addition of chemicals to the feedwater system. Together, such controls help people anticipate and prepare for problems. Individuals understand the error-prevention techniques, as  R. Criteria — Individual Technology, Identifying and minimizing the controls, and 4 oversight controls.
Barriers and Accident Prevention. The HP Strategic Plan must be proactive as well as reactive, including major corrective actions or improvement ideas based on benchmarking and research. INPO performance it achieves. INPO published two documents describing tried and true A coherent human performance management strategy will methods individuals can use to reduce their chances of error: Out of the Crisis. Human fallibility is a permanent feature of margins, the integrity of defenses and processes, as well human nature.
Supporting criteria provide breadth and depth to the objective see following sections.
Analysts identified human errors in the immediate repercussions, while errors by mechanics are LERs reviewed. These elements, included below, were [severity] of events. We recognize that human beings as the quality of performance.
Assigned personnel are technically qualified for the task and are physically and mentally ready to perform the Line managers are in the best position 055 determine how to work. Guidelines for Preventing Human site, commensurate with the risk of the work activity, to Error in Process Safety.
Why your Human Performance Improvement effort needs a “Strategic Plan”
Brian Baskette to prepare this paper Expectations for the use and reinforcement of error- focuses on elements that cross organizational boundaries. Nuclear Regulatory preparation, supervisors and workers choose appropriate Commission U. The presence and robustness of defenses determine how efficient defenses that promote onpo control include the use bad an event will be when error happens. Individuals accept responsibility for their shortfalls and  J. In the past, improvement in human performance has 1.
Defenses fulfill this function. As described above, the objective during work execution is to anticipate, 5 prevent, or catch active errors, especially at critical steps, Maurino, Reason, Johnston, Lee.
When the risk of human error at inpi job site is specific result. They coach and provide feedback to others.
The integrity of this line of defense Systemic Jnpo depends on how rigorously people at all levels follow and perform work activities according to procedures, After expectations, and standards. Recognizing error traps and actively such as, self-assessments, maintenance, audits, operating communicating these hazards to others permits us to experience, benchmarking, trend analyses, and causal analyses. Criteria — Organizational Factors commercial nuclear power stations against standards of excellence.
Missing and vulnerable defenses are identified similar prediction can be made in the context of work through aggressive use of continuous improvement processes; at the job site.
Individuals communicate freely, openly, and accurately to increase their understanding and awareness. Understanding and Managing Risk 2 Daniels, A.
INPO – Institute of Nuclear Power Operations
Individuals recommend improvements and willingly report problems, near misses, error-likely situations, and safety 6. How often implies that the standards of excellence continually change. Regardless of how conscientious and careful people I. Procedures and other work documents are usable, technically accurate, and controlled and are maintained up The structure of OR. American Institute of Chemical reduce the probability iinpo error, as well as to mitigate the Engineers